<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="http://forum.xfce.org/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=3132&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Xfce Forums / Notification-daemon-xfce-0.3.6 (4.4.0) conflicts with version of RC2?) [SOLVED]]]></title>
		<link>http://forum.xfce.org/viewtopic.php?id=3132</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Notification-daemon-xfce-0.3.6 (4.4.0) conflicts with version of RC2?) [SOLVED].]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 18:46:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Notification-daemon-xfce-0.3.6 (4.4.0) conflicts with version of RC2?) [SOLVED]]]></title>
			<link>http://forum.xfce.org/viewtopic.php?pid=13231#p13231</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Got it!</p><p>I replaced the folowing packages from Mandriva&#039;s standard install by the ones prepared by <a href="http://www.eslrahc.com/2007.0/" rel="nofollow">Charles Edwards</a>:</p><ul><li><p>thunar-0.8.0</p></li><li><p>libthunar1_2-0.8.0</p></li><li><p>exo-0.3.2</p></li><li><p>libexo-0.3_0</p></li></ul><p>These packages apparently have been compiled with HAL support; clicking on the USB-key icon mounts it (provided a directory /mnt/key exists, but that is something I can fix). Note that just replacing exo and libexo was [i]not/i] sufficient.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Pindakoe)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 18:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://forum.xfce.org/viewtopic.php?pid=13231#p13231</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Notification-daemon-xfce-0.3.6 (4.4.0) conflicts with version of RC2?) [SOLVED]]]></title>
			<link>http://forum.xfce.org/viewtopic.php?pid=13230#p13230</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I do have /usr/lib/libexo-hal-0.3.so.0 and /usr/lib/libexo-hal-0.3.so.0.4.0. These come from libexo, versions 0.3.1.8 and 0.3.2. My guess is that the the 0.3.2 version was built differently than the 0.3.1.8 version -- such is progress (and the concept of building from source is becoming another step more attractive, may be this is the time to check the Os-cillation installer). Will do some further digging and probably file a report with Mandriva</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Pindakoe)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 18:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://forum.xfce.org/viewtopic.php?pid=13230#p13230</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Notification-daemon-xfce-0.3.6 (4.4.0) conflicts with version of RC2?) [SOLVED]]]></title>
			<link>http://forum.xfce.org/viewtopic.php?pid=13209#p13209</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>If you get a notification, one of the 2 daemons in running, which is good enough. The notifications have nothing to do with the mount part of exo, it&#039;s an optional option.</p><p>And the warning is quite obvious: hal support was not enabled or no hal devel package was found during the configure stage of exo. (So you probably don&#039;t have the libexo-hal.so library.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Nick)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 21:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://forum.xfce.org/viewtopic.php?pid=13209#p13209</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Notification-daemon-xfce-0.3.6 (4.4.0) conflicts with version of RC2?) [SOLVED]]]></title>
			<link>http://forum.xfce.org/viewtopic.php?pid=13206#p13206</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Nick. I have got libnotify1-0.4.2 installed (cannot install libnotify1-0.4.3.2 as that requires notification-daemon-xfce-0.3.6 which concflicts with notification-daemon-0.3.5). </p><p>Could this lead to problems with auto-mouting of USB-keys and/or CD&#039;s? I notice that with 4.4.0 tehse do not automatically mount, whereas 4.4.RC2 auto-mounted (at least) USB keys without problem (open, thunar, click on Icon which appears in Thunar shortcuts and you&#039;ll see all files). Now I get the following message instead: </p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>Failed to mount &quot;sda1&quot;.
exo-mount: Cannot mount by HAL device UDI, because HAL support was disabled for this build.</code></pre></div><p>Have been seraching for help, found <a href="http://forum.xfce.org/index.php?topic=3102.0" rel="nofollow">these</a> <a href="http://forum.xfce.org/index.php?topic=3089.0" rel="nofollow">posts</a> but am none the wiser.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Pindakoe)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 20:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://forum.xfce.org/viewtopic.php?pid=13206#p13206</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Notification-daemon-xfce-0.3.6 (4.4.0) conflicts with version of RC2?) [SOLVED]]]></title>
			<link>http://forum.xfce.org/viewtopic.php?pid=13175#p13175</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I did some renaming of the binaries in 0.3.6, but that was to avoid conflicts. Btw you only need 1 daemon (or the gnome or the Xfce one), the real application dependency is libnotify.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Nick)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 18:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://forum.xfce.org/viewtopic.php?pid=13175#p13175</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Notification-daemon-xfce-0.3.6 (4.4.0) conflicts with version of RC2?) [SOLVED]]]></title>
			<link>http://forum.xfce.org/viewtopic.php?pid=13174#p13174</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I cannot completely upgrade from RC2 (4.3.99.2) to 4.4.0 final -- my package manager (urpmi; I run mandriva) refuses to install these two packages:</p><p>libnotify1-0.4.3-2mdv2007.0.i586<br />notification-daemon-xfce-0.3.6-5mdv2007.0.i586</p><p>The error message is that notification-daemon-xfce (version 0.3.5) conflicts with notification-daemon-xfce-0.3.6-5mdv2007.0.i586. The 0.3.5 version of teh package came with 4.3.99.2; the 0.3.<strong>6</strong> came with 4.4.0. A number of key gnome applications (evolution, gdm) depend on notification-daemon-0.3.5.</p><p>Is this a packaging error, or is 0.3.6 truely different from 0.3.5? Thanks for any insights.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Pindakoe)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 18:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://forum.xfce.org/viewtopic.php?pid=13174#p13174</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
