<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="http://forum.xfce.org/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=6522&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Xfce Forums / Should have tried XFCE sooner]]></title>
		<link>http://forum.xfce.org/viewtopic.php?id=6522</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Should have tried XFCE sooner.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 01:09:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Should have tried XFCE sooner]]></title>
			<link>http://forum.xfce.org/viewtopic.php?pid=23806#p23806</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Yet another Gnome refugee here (it looks like you&#039;re seeing a lot of that lately).&#160; I&#039;m a long time Linux user from Red Hat to Mandrake to Ubuntu (and a couple others short term for good measure).</p><p>After looking around in the wake of the Gnome Shell fiasco, it looked like XFCE provided the best option to get back to work (and play) using workflows I have developed over many years.&#160; It turns out that for my purposes, XFCE is *FAR* more easily configurable than Gnome 2 ever was.&#160; I should have tried XFCE years ago!&#160; Great job guys - I think I&#039;m here to stay.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (redhorse)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 01:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://forum.xfce.org/viewtopic.php?pid=23806#p23806</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
