<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="http://forum.xfce.org/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=7321&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Xfce Forums / Remarks about Xfce 4.10]]></title>
		<link>http://forum.xfce.org/viewtopic.php?id=7321</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Remarks about Xfce 4.10.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2012 22:55:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Remarks about Xfce 4.10]]></title>
			<link>http://forum.xfce.org/viewtopic.php?pid=27029#p27029</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks a lot Jerome.</p><p>Be sure I&#039;ll file bugs wherever applicable. Thanks for the hints.</p><p>As for Thunar media tags plugin, it seems to do the trick. FYI I asked because a couple of months/years ago Gentoo maintainers retired the media plugin that was then used because of various unfixed bugs and because the project seemed to be dead. Never saw there was a new one (or the old one was continued, I don&#039;t know) so this one comes handy.</p><p>Now about tabs in Thunar, I haven&#039;t personally followed the long (and probably boring, as far as Xfce developers have been requested) story but I&#039;d say, in all objectivity, that a response like &quot;<em>they think it&#039;s useless and thus don&#039;t want to waste their time to implement it</em>&quot; is bound to attract the kinds of reactions I have read.</p><p>First because &quot;think&quot; is an opinion, not a fact. Second because the number of requests for tabs is enough of a justification there are people who&#039;ll use them. Lastly because it has a name when the opinion of a few takes precedence over the desires of many. I&#039;d say it is but show humility and openness of mind. However I haven&#039;t said Xfce developers lack openness of mind and humility, there&#039;s a difference between &quot;show&quot; and &quot;be&quot;.</p><p>I know, as a developer myself, there have been moments I tried to convince people their requests didn&#039;t make more sense than using a workaround they knew, which brought them perfect satisfaction. I just find it sad that Thunar won&#039;t include tabs unless a good willing soul takes it up on herself. In the facts all the file managers I know of (Konqueror, Nautilus, PCManFM) do handle tabs, Thunar does not and is the only one I know which doesn&#039;t. That again should be a good indication there has to be at least a few more people than there are Thunar developers who find it useful, right? <img src="http://forum.xfce.org/img/smilies/wink.png" width="15" height="15" alt="wink" /></p><p>But I will do with your reply. And if one day I&#039;m feeling brave enough to implement those tabs, well, why not, let&#039;s see.</p><p>Thanks again for your insights.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (VinzC)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2012 22:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://forum.xfce.org/viewtopic.php?pid=27029#p27029</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Remarks about Xfce 4.10]]></title>
			<link>http://forum.xfce.org/viewtopic.php?pid=27026#p27026</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p><p>1. A lot of your concerns are already filed as bug reports on the Xfce Bugzilla. I invite you to go through the list (<a href="https://bugzilla.xfce.org/buglist.cgi?resolution=---&amp;resolution=DUPLICATE&amp;classification=Xfce&amp;query_format=advanced&amp;product=Xfce4-appfinder" rel="nofollow">https://bugzilla.xfce.org/buglist.cgi?r … -appfinder</a>) and to file addtional bug reports if some of your concerns are not already reported. Please file one bug report per issue to ease the work of developers.</p><p>2. Please file a bug report about that on bugzilla.xfce.org.</p><p>3. Last thread about that: <a href="http://forum.xfce.org/viewtopic.php?id=6726" rel="nofollow">http://forum.xfce.org/viewtopic.php?id=6726</a> Summary: unlikely to happen.</p><p>4. There is <a href="http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/thunar-plugins/thunar-media-tags-plugin" rel="nofollow">http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/thunar … ags-plugin</a>, I don&#039;t if it&#039;s compatible with Xfce 4.10 though (the wiki page is outdated).</p><p>Cheers,</p><p>Jérôme</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (jeromeg)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2012 10:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://forum.xfce.org/viewtopic.php?pid=27026#p27026</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Remarks about Xfce 4.10]]></title>
			<link>http://forum.xfce.org/viewtopic.php?pid=27025#p27025</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi all.</p><p>I have installed Xfce 4.10 (upgraded from 4.8, kinda) on my Gentoo home machine. There are many enhancements I found useful and quite interesting. Here are some remarks though.</p><p>1. The run command (alt+F2)</p><p>The previous implementation (Xfce 4.8) was super efficient if one had to run a previously typed command again. My favourite example: xfdesktop --reload . Under Xfce 4.8, all you had to do (if you had already typed the command) was hit Alt+F2 then Enter. Now with 4.10 it&#039;s Alt+F2, Down, Down, Left, Down, Right, then all the way down for commands are sorted aplhabetically...</p><p>Honestly, this is the worst kind of change I&#039;ve seen. Of course it concerns my own little case (selfishly, I admit) but if only the Run applet just did remember the last command I typed, I wouldn&#039;t have minded the change.</p><p>I know I can type the first characters of a command instead but what if I don&#039;t remember the command? For instance, I&#039;d have expected pressing the Down key would have brought the history of commands I typed, like in web browsers when you press Down in a field when Autocomplete is enabled. And then only bring the list of application icons with a Browse button. But the latter shouldn&#039;t be the default action, IMHO.</p><p>2. Minor this time: the tooltip over special folder icons on the desktop. There&#039;s no left/right margin in the tooltip. Would be prettier with a few pixels margin.</p><p>3. The classical wish-to-have: tabs in Thunar. PCManFM crashes too often (e.g. dropping from Xarchiver) to be used as a viable alternative.</p><p>4. Thunar plugins to show info about media files, at least more than just the resolution and size of images. Like ID3Tags, audio/video codec infos...</p><p>Other than that Xfce has been my favourite desktop for years. Thanks for the work anyway.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (VinzC)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2012 21:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://forum.xfce.org/viewtopic.php?pid=27025#p27025</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
