Xfce Forum

Sub domains
 

You are not logged in.

#26 2013-04-30 01:46:42

bwat47
Member
Registered: 2011-04-11
Posts: 22

Re: About the state of GTK3

gtk2 has no future, the switch to GTK3 probably won't be 100% perfect but IMO its something that needs to be done.

Offline

#27 2013-05-01 20:48:00

MagnusBerg
Member
Registered: 2004-12-17
Posts: 44

Re: About the state of GTK3

hoagie wrote:

Heres an interesting read regarding toolkits from one of the lxde developers: http://blog.lxde.org/?p=990

... and some older stuff about theme etc.-breaking: http://igurublog.wordpress.com/2012/11/ … in-threes/

I read the last link and was scared. The blog post has a year on it's shoulders and I hasn't followed the Gnome developers latest steps but if it continue as written in the blog post there are reasons to boycott Gnome. And there are reasons to port Xfce4 to Qt. Reading the first link gave a little impression that LXDE are going to be Qt based in the future. The LXDE developer has written a migrate from Gtk+ to Qt guide. http://wiki.lxde.org/en/Migrate_from_GTK%2B_to_Qt

Offline

#28 2013-05-03 08:23:57

Jristz
Member
From: Sud-America
Registered: 2011-06-02
Posts: 82

Re: About the state of GTK3

MagnusBerg wrote:
hoagie wrote:

Heres an interesting read regarding toolkits from one of the lxde developers: http://blog.lxde.org/?p=990

... and some older stuff about theme etc.-breaking: http://igurublog.wordpress.com/2012/11/ … in-threes/

I read the last link and was scared. The blog post has a year on it's shoulders and I hasn't followed the Gnome developers latest steps but if it continue as written in the blog post there are reasons to boycott Gnome. And there are reasons to port Xfce4 to Qt. Reading the first link gave a little impression that LXDE are going to be Qt based in the future. The LXDE developer has written a migrate from Gtk+ to Qt guide. http://wiki.lxde.org/en/Migrate_from_GTK%2B_to_Qt

PCMANFM the guy behind lxrandr port to QT in 1 day and PCManFM-qt port a(ANd the majority of LXDE)say that programing for GTK3 is a nightmare compared to QT that is pleasant
her drop those words beffore end the porting of pcmanfm-qt

at this point I think that is best hear a words from anyone of the devs because, users can say 1000 words but dev are the only one that have dirty hands and know how this really work


XFCE :: Arch Linux
:: Intel(R) Atom(R) N270 @ 4W at 1.60GHz
:: ntel Corporation Mobile 945GSE Express Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03)
:: LED WSVGA of 10.1" (1,024 x 600)

Offline

#29 2013-05-07 03:10:37

the_file
Member
Registered: 2013-02-17
Posts: 36

Re: About the state of GTK3

Jristz wrote:
MagnusBerg wrote:
hoagie wrote:

Heres an interesting read regarding toolkits from one of the lxde developers: http://blog.lxde.org/?p=990

... and some older stuff about theme etc.-breaking: http://igurublog.wordpress.com/2012/11/ … in-threes/

I read the last link and was scared. The blog post has a year on it's shoulders and I hasn't followed the Gnome developers latest steps but if it continue as written in the blog post there are reasons to boycott Gnome. And there are reasons to port Xfce4 to Qt. Reading the first link gave a little impression that LXDE are going to be Qt based in the future. The LXDE developer has written a migrate from Gtk+ to Qt guide. http://wiki.lxde.org/en/Migrate_from_GTK%2B_to_Qt

PCMANFM the guy behind lxrandr port to QT in 1 day and PCManFM-qt port a(ANd the majority of LXDE)say that programing for GTK3 is a nightmare compared to QT that is pleasant
her drop those words beffore end the porting of pcmanfm-qt

at this point I think that is best hear a words from anyone of the devs because, users can say 1000 words but dev are the only one that have dirty hands and know how this really work

Seems like a lot of devs are claiming that GTK is messy and dirty to code. Sure the UI looks nice but if the code is bad then it will lead to trouble.

Perhaps someone should fork GTK, since GTK is virtually not changing very much with every release.

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB