You are not logged in.
Just getting started with Thunar and while I can easily add bookmarks to most locations on the file system via `~/.config/gtk-3.0/bookmarks`, unfortunately `file:///` is not a valid path in most (all?) environments and Thunar doesn't seem to support it either.
Whilst I can add a bookmark for something `/usr` instead (`file:///usr`) and manually open up the parent directory from there, thought I'd check to see if there was something I missed or another syntax that would allow this.
Thanks!
Offline
Hello and welcome.
Which distro and what version of thunar are you using? file:/// works for me - are you getting a specific error?
Please remember to mark your thread [SOLVED] to make it easier for others to find
--- How To Ask For Help | FAQ | Developer Wiki | Community | Contribute ---
Offline
Using a somewhat configured Arch, Thunar v4.18.11.
No errors or warnings anywhere as far as I can tell -- simply the bookmark is ignored/doesn't show up. I've added other bookmarks that way and they're working just fine. As mentioned, changing that file path to say `file:///usr` also lets it show up, so I haven't typo'd it.
Supposedly `file:///` is invalid in bash and derivative shells? Only just read that tonight, so not 100% on that and it's what I was referencing with this:
unfortunately `file:///` is not a valid path in most (all?) environments
Offline
file:/// works for me as well as just /. You should have this bookmark in the side pane under "File System" under Devices.
Siduction
Debian Sid
Xfce 4.18
Offline
`/` interestingly will show up as a bookmark in Thunar, but attempting to open it will result in `Failed to open "/" Operation not supported.` `file:///`, as mentioned, won't even show up.
Good shout for Devices -> File System though, I had indeed somehow disabled that and forgot about it! Works great.
Edit: Sorry, tried to mark the post as solved by editing the title but it won't let me actually type [solved], the form blocks character input. Not quite sure how I'm supposed to work around that.
Edit2: Editing the field value manually via browser devtools show the field is limited to 70 characters (it really should display this, but I digress). Are we meant to lop off part of the title to support this?
Last edited by rchristian (2024-10-31 10:04:57)
Offline
[ Generated in 0.008 seconds, 7 queries executed - Memory usage: 535.84 KiB (Peak: 536.68 KiB) ]