Xfce Forum

Sub domains
 

You are not logged in.

#1 2025-08-13 17:23:53

ravenpi
Member
Registered: 2025-08-13
Posts: 2
LinuxFirefox 128.0

[SOLVED] xfce4-terminal zoom issue.

UPDATE: I went to the Debian "snapshot" site at http://snapshot.debian.org/package/xfce4-terminal/ and installed prior versions -- all of them worked _except_ 1.1.4, so I guess this is a recent regression?

Hey, all.  One of the main reasons I wound up with xfce4-terminal -- even when running MATE or whatever -- is because I love the zoom: <ctl><shift>+ and I zoom both the window size, itself, and proportionally, the font.  Or... did, for years.  But recently -- both times on ARM (one Debian on a Mac via Fusion, the other on my ARM Thinkpad running Ubuntu) -- it only zooms the font, which is the same behavior as gnome-terminal and mate-terminal, and I loathe that.

Am I doing something stupid?  I've tried both with keyboard shortcut and with View -> Zoom In.

Thanks, and apologies...

-Ken

P.S.  Current problem child is my Debian MATE install, with xfce4-terminal v. 1.1.4, Debian 13.

Last edited by ravenpi (2025-08-13 18:43:03)

Offline

#2 2025-08-13 18:22:07

ToZ
Administrator
From: Canada
Registered: 2011-06-02
Posts: 12,123
LinuxFirefox 141.0

Re: [SOLVED] xfce4-terminal zoom issue.

Hello and welcome.

This functionality was changed in 1.1.4 (https://gitlab.xfce.org/apps/xfce4-term … 2c9bb6b4e4). But reverted to the old behaviour in 1.1.5 (https://gitlab.xfce.org/apps/xfce4-term … 792a0cff2a) as the change was controversial.


Mark solved threads as [SOLVED] to make it easier for others to find solutions.
--- How To Ask For Help | FAQ | Developer Wiki  |  Community | Contribute ---

Offline

#3 2025-08-13 18:42:18

ravenpi
Member
Registered: 2025-08-13
Posts: 2
LinuxFirefox 128.0

Re: [SOLVED] xfce4-terminal zoom issue.

ToZ wrote:

Hello and welcome.

This functionality was changed in 1.1.4 (https://gitlab.xfce.org/apps/xfce4-term … 2c9bb6b4e4). But reverted to the old behaviour in 1.1.5 (https://gitlab.xfce.org/apps/xfce4-term … 792a0cff2a) as the change was controversial.

Oh, wow!  Thanks!!

Offline

Registered users online in this topic: 0, guests: 1
[Bot] ClaudeBot

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB
Modified by Visman

[ Generated in 0.021 seconds, 8 queries executed - Memory usage: 530.85 KiB (Peak: 531.7 KiB) ]