Xfce Forum

Sub domains
 

You are not logged in.

#1 2011-02-14 05:15:01

escapingsummer
Member
From: D.C. Metro Area
Registered: 2010-12-14
Posts: 34

Brainstorming

I am considering forking lxdm and perhaps writing Xfce's own display manager. I wanted to know how Xfce's general community feels about this, and any concerns that you guys may have.


"True sophistication and ingenuity comes from trying to solve complicated things by the simplest of means."

Desktop- Fedora XFCE x86_64
Netbook- Modified Fedora 14 security spin -fluxbox/Fedora XFCE

Offline

#2 2011-02-15 15:36:35

Nick
Dev
From: ~
Registered: 2005-02-17
Posts: 1,144
Website

Re: Brainstorming

There are so many display manager out there; lxdm (which has no dependencies you can drop with your fork), lightdm, gdm, slim. What do you want to change to be different from the others?

Offline

#3 2011-02-15 16:40:15

escapingsummer
Member
From: D.C. Metro Area
Registered: 2010-12-14
Posts: 34

Re: Brainstorming

I didn't want to drop dependencies or anything like that, rather add features  and clean it up for use with Xfce a little bit more. If it sounds like a bad idea I won't go any further, like the post said it was just brainstorming. I also looked at the possibility of modifying slim, however I had A LOT of issues with it on my netbook and quickly reinstalled lxdm and began tinkering there.

Last edited by escapingsummer (2011-02-15 16:45:32)


"True sophistication and ingenuity comes from trying to solve complicated things by the simplest of means."

Desktop- Fedora XFCE x86_64
Netbook- Modified Fedora 14 security spin -fluxbox/Fedora XFCE

Offline

#4 2011-02-15 17:03:20

Nick
Dev
From: ~
Registered: 2005-02-17
Posts: 1,144
Website

Re: Brainstorming

I'd say make a theme for lxde that fits Xfce. I've never looked at the lxde code, but it seems to work for most people, but there are no themes for it.

Offline

Registered users online in this topic: 0, guests: 1
[Bot] ClaudeBot

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB
Modified by Visman

[ Generated in 0.010 seconds, 7 queries executed - Memory usage: 524.62 KiB (Peak: 529.44 KiB) ]