You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
The text in the desktop launchers or files looks really bad. It not a necessity, but it would be nice it has some antialiasing or shadow of some kind so that the fonts look good as in the file manager.
Really appreciate the hard works from all volunteers.
Regards, Debasish
Last edited by debasish patra (2014-12-13 14:30:11)
Offline
Which version of Xfce? Which distro? A screenshot would also help us to see what bad looks like.
Fonts can be set via Settings Manager >> Appearance >> Fonts tab (including anti-aliasing, hinting and sub-pixel ordering). Does making a change there have any effect?
Please remember to mark your thread [SOLVED] to make it easier for others to find
--- How To Ask For Help | FAQ | Developer Wiki | Community | Contribute ---
Offline
Thanks Toz for the response.
I am using the latest xfce from git in arch linux.
Subpixel rensering is working perfectly for everything. This issue is only related to desktop folders or files alone.
You can see the difference below. I have taken screenshots from mate desktop and xfce desktop with same white background.
Mate Screenshot
Xfce Screenshot
Last edited by debasish patra (2014-12-14 10:31:14)
Offline
Interesting. I'm also running Xfce from git and I'm not seeing this problem.
Are you running both Mate and Xfce on the same computer?
Can you confirm the version of xfdesktop:
xfdesktop -V
And just to double-check some of the settings, can you post back:
xfconf-query -c xfce4-desktop -p /desktop-icons -lv
xfconf-query -c xsettings -lv
Please remember to mark your thread [SOLVED] to make it easier for others to find
--- How To Ask For Help | FAQ | Developer Wiki | Community | Contribute ---
Offline
in addition look your gtkrc for font settings
https://developer.gnome.org/gtk2/stable … -antialias
and maybe there is an override for xfdesktop
eg something like this:
Offline
Interesting. I'm also running Xfce from git and I'm not seeing this problem.
Are you running both Mate and Xfce on the same computer?
Can you confirm the version of xfdesktop:
xfdesktop -V
And just to double-check some of the settings, can you post back:
xfconf-query -c xfce4-desktop -p /desktop-icons -lv xfconf-query -c xsettings -lv
Yes, I have installed mate as well. But I can confirm that this issue with xfce desktop has nothing to do with mate. Since I installed it some few days before.
But I have been using xfce for a very long time.
And here we go ...
[d@DArchLinux ~]$ xfdesktop -V
This is xfdesktop version 4.11.8git-694b10f, running on Xfce 4.10.
Built with GTK+ 2.24.25, linked with GTK+ 2.24.25.
Build options:
Desktop Menu: enabled
Desktop Icons: enabled
Desktop File Icons: enabled
[d@DArchLinux ~]$ xfconf-query -c xfce4-desktop -p /desktop-icons -lv
/desktop-icons/file-icons/show-filesystem false
/desktop-icons/file-icons/show-home false
/desktop-icons/file-icons/show-removable false
/desktop-icons/file-icons/show-trash false
/desktop-icons/icon-size 32
[d@DArchLinux ~]$ xfconf-query -c xsettings -lv
/Gtk/ButtonImages false
/Gtk/CanChangeAccels false
/Gtk/ColorPalette black:white:gray50:red:purple:blue:light blue:green:yellow:orange:lavender:brown:goldenrod4:dodger blue:pink:light green:gray10:gray30:gray75:gray90
/Gtk/CursorThemeName Adwaita
/Gtk/CursorThemeSize 0
/Gtk/FontName Segoe UI 10
/Gtk/IconSizes
/Gtk/KeyThemeName
/Gtk/MenuBarAccel F10
/Gtk/MenuImages true
/Gtk/ToolbarIconSize 3
/Gtk/ToolbarStyle icons
/Net/CursorBlink true
/Net/CursorBlinkTime 1200
/Net/DndDragThreshold 8
/Net/DoubleClickDistance 5
/Net/DoubleClickTime 400
/Net/EnableEventSounds false
/Net/EnableInputFeedbackSounds false
/Net/IconThemeName Faenza-Darkest
/Net/SoundThemeName default
/Net/ThemeName Numix
/Xfce/LastCustomDPI 96
/Xft/Antialias 1
/Xft/DPI -1
/Xft/Hinting -1
/Xft/HintStyle hintslight
/Xft/RGBA rgb
Last edited by debasish patra (2014-12-14 14:38:39)
Offline
in addition look your gtkrc for font settings
https://developer.gnome.org/gtk2/stable … -antialias
and maybe there is an override for xfdesktop
eg something like this:
Thanks sixsixfive.
I am using numix theme. Below code is present in gtkrc.
style "xfdesktop-icon-view" {
XfdesktopIconView::label-alpha = 0
XfdesktopIconView::selected-label-alpha = 60
XfdesktopIconVIew::ellipsize-icon-labels = 1
base[NORMAL] = @selected_bg_color
base[SELECTED] = @selected_bg_color
base[ACTIVE] = @selected_bg_color
fg[NORMAL] = @selected_fg_color
fg[SELECTED] = @selected_fg_color
fg[ACTIVE] = @selected_fg_color
engine "murrine" {
textstyle = 5
text_shade = 0.05
}
}
Do you see anything wrong ?
Offline
Ok if I add the below code in
style "xfdesktop-icon-view"
in the Numix theme then I am able to get the same look.
XfdesktopIconView::shadow-x-offset = 1
XfdesktopIconView::shadow-y-offset = 1
XfdesktopIconView::selected-shadow-x-offset = 1
XfdesktopIconView::selected-shadow-y-offset = 1
But how mate is rendering it fine without any tweaks ?
Offline
>But how mate is rendering it fine without any tweaks ?
MATE uses caja to to render the desktop.
the murrine engine has it's own textshadows just like xfdesktop, so they will conflict and create 2 textshadows which leads to this weird text
Offline
>But how mate is rendering it fine without any tweaks ?
MATE uses caja to to render the desktop.
the murrine engine has it's own textshadows just like xfdesktop, so they will conflict and create 2 textshadows which leads to this weird text
Actually if we see in the screenshot, there is no shadow to begin with, which is the problem. If the text and background is of same color e.g. white as in screenshot, it is not very pleasing to the eye.
Offline
http://gnome-look.org/content/show.php?content=42755
- New option: textstyle = 1 for a shadow at the bottom of the text.
textstyle = 2 for a shadow at the top of the text.
textstyle = 3 for a shadow at the bottom right of the text.
textstyle = 4 for a shadow at the top left of the text.
- New option: text_shade = 1.0 to specify the shade effect of the text’s shadow.
I never used the murrine engine, so i have really no idea how a text shade of 0.05 would look like, but there is also no textstyle 5 according to the settings
Offline
Pages: 1
[ Generated in 0.024 seconds, 7 queries executed - Memory usage: 588.91 KiB (Peak: 605.75 KiB) ]